Seems like the whole of Europe is currently up in arms against Google streetview showing their houses (let’s not even start with the sniffed wireless points and their data) and as friends in Google tell me there are queues in the Google Germany office where people request their houses to be removed.

The reason is privacy and people are worried about security. As my mom put it “Thieves only need to use that Streetview thing and see where there are nice houses to steal things” to which I replied that they could also use a technology like a bicycle or a car to do the same thing and they wouldn’t have to go far to steal things.

Now, today a friend of mine Christian Bräunlich had a damn good idea and put it on a mailing list:

Bestimmte Leute wollen ja ihre Haeuser nicht im Streetview haben. Mein
Vorschlag zur Loesung: es wird ein spezieller 2D-Barcode definiert. Jeder kann
sich den ausdrucken und über die Tür kleben. Dieses Haus wird dann verpixelt.
Vorteil: geringer Aufwand, erprobte Technik: das hat schon vor 6000 Jahren
funktioniert. Häuser können automatisiert verpixelt werden. Den Barcode sieht
man kaum, man könnte ja verschiedene je nach Hausfarbe, definieren.
Ich denke ja nicht, dass alle fristgerecht ihre Anträge einreichen koennen zur
Entfernung, und ausserdem bindet das doch viel Manpower bei Google.

In English:

Some people aren’t happy about seeing their houses in Streetview. Here’s my proposal for a solution: you define a 2D barcode that people can print out and display on their house. Houses with a bar code don’t added to Streetview. The benefits are: this is simple to achieve, the technique is old and already proven (6000 years ago, really). You can hardly see the barcode and you could offer several different ones according to the colour of the house. I don’t think that people will be able to send in their requests to be removed from Streetview in time and the overhead in manpower at Google to respond to removal requests is another problem.

This is the opt-out idea. You could also turn that around and make it an opt-in. If you want to have your house in – display a barcode.

The only problem I can see with this is when you have houses with several tenants. The other benefit of this is that Google could offer these barcodes and send them by mail. They could also create a generator that would allow for example shops to also add their names and product offers in the barcode data and thus enhance the Streetview information even further. What do you think?

I get very tired of people looking for rockstar and ninja developers. I find it arrogant and actually detrimental to the whole market of development. We are professionals and we should take our jobs serious. We should also make sure that people who start in a company don’t have to deal with a terrible mess rather than being able to contribute immediately.

During my whole career I concentrated not on bringing myself into the centre and be the rockstar of a department but instead try damn hard to build sustainable teams and departments. This might have been a wrong decision in terms of money but seeing people grow and processes improve gives me a bigger kick than being admired as the guy who knows it all. There is a lot of quick glory in being a “Ninja” or a “Rockstar” but it is actually bad for the company. It is also a problem for your own career as you make people dependent on you rather than being able to grow and change to what you want to be and do in the future.

One of the big mistakes I was part of in the past was that I was part of a team of rockstars. When I joined the company the mandate was to get the best people in front end development and build the coolest products. I was proud as punch to be able to hire people I had a boatload of respect for and always wanted to work with. We all had the best ideas, we had the talent and we were hungry to prove ourselves.

What we didn’t have was the insight into how to make a large company care as much about what we do as we did. What we also didn’t have is the patience to understand that people who don’t want to immediately support you don’t do that out of spite but because they have other things to worry about. A big part of work is politics and that means that things don’t move as quickly as engineers want to. This is a human issue – take too many people to make a decision and it will take longer. On the other hand this decision can become a much better one as it has been scrutinised from several angles. Sadly enough in most cases when it comes to decisions made across departments of companies they don’t turn out better. The reason is that people don’t talk to another but follow their individual agendas instead. A lot of companies made process the goal and not the way towards the goal.

I am right now preparing my talk for this year’s Paris Web and it will revolve around the issue of getting listened to in the company and the market if you are a technical person. We can delude ourselves into thinking that building great products will get us fame and insight and be listened to but in the end it will be the product managers who’ll be remembered being the people who brought these products to life and not the people who built them.

The rockstar analogy

I think my ex-colleague JR Conlin hit the nail on the head:

Being a real rockstar gets you the fame, the sex and the drugs. However it also robs you of your privacy, forces you to repeat over and over again what you’ve done in the past and it typecasts you:

It also means that unless you are clever and you start your own label or production company or do your own merchandise a lot of people will make a lot of money on top of your talent and you only get a small share of that.

Rockstar fame is very fleeting – people who are on top now can be amazingly quickly forgotten tomorrow. Popularity is quite a tough thing to keep up and any slip-up you have will be all over the news and misinterpreted to become headlines. At first this aids your bad boy image but later on when you get older it just appears pathetic.

In essence being a rockstar means burning out quickly with a lot of glory but not much sustenance. And if you don’t plan cleverly for your future you’ll end up playing carnivals and open up shopping malls. I have a hard time to find the equivalent for an IT rock star.

For a company it means you have a employee that is hard to work with and that you need to keep happy all the time. A diva that is very much aware of his or her temporary fame and makes ridiculous demands (check the rider of some rock bands or talk to some roadies or people who work in theatres for tales of woe). You also concentrate on a single person and thus cause jealousy in the rest of your staff which means that they either under-perform, try to sabotage the rockstar or leave.

It also means that you have to sort out the troubles your rockstar gets into. Unmaintainable products that have the handwriting of one genius developer and no documentation on them are the IT equivalent of trashed hotel rooms. Headhunters calling your rockstar are the equivalent of the paparazzi. The only thing that is less likely to happen is getting into troubles with groupies.

In essence I see the demand of rockstars as a flattering way of companies to find somebody to quickly burn out and get a quick product out of that can be hyped. Nothing sustainable and especially nothing that hints that there will be a chance of a career for you in that environment. You start at the top of your game and you are expected to over-perform. Any request to get official support to improve will be seen as a weakness.

The Ninja analogy

People calling themselves $technology-ninja has only recently become popular. John Resig was one of the first with the JavaScript Ninja mailing list (which has become very silent as of late) and Nicole Sullivan had an interview published that started with the notion of her calling herself a Ninja.

You know what? I forgive both of them this – both John and Nicole consistently worked in silence and out of a sudden released a deadly cool technique or product before they went off again to hone their skills on the next attack. They never celebrated themselves much but instead promoted technologies to use in a professional environment and to get quick results. I am friends with them and I admire them for what they did and what they are about to do. I am confident they have more and more cool things up their sleeves in the future.

Lately, however, the Ninja analogy runs rampant with 4606 of them being available on LinkedIn:

A lot of the self proclaimed Ninja know their trade but it is actually interesting to see what they have forgotten when it comes to being a Ninja:

• Ninja attack silently and use the element of surprise
• Ninja disguise themselves to blend in
• Ninja are not seen or heard
• Ninja use a series of passwords and own languages to talk to another to be more effective

As a company, hiring a Ninja only makes sense if you want to disrupt your competition as the main tasks of Ninja are:

• Espionage – do you want to get rid of your secrets?
• Sabotage – hire a rockstar instead, he’ll make sure your products will decay quickly
• Assassination – not that applicable either.

When it comes to the JavaScript Ninja mailing list this made sense – a closed community with an own language that shares secrets with another and leaks them to the outside world to sabotage bad products and assassinate bad practices. And most people on it are rarely seen or heard (Dean Edwards and Stuart Langridge anyone?).

When it comes to people who call themselves a $technology-ninja the metaphor quickly crumbles to the same levels of “I am a social media expert” or “SEO wizard”.

Look for Sensei, Mercenaries and Padawan instead

If you really want to use an analogy (I don’t think we need to but hey, they sell like hotcakes) then I’d think you should focus on people who really will help your company:

• Mercenaries – in the middle ages we had mercenaries who roamed the land offering their strength and skill with their weapon to anyone who could afford them. They also were masters of marketing and changed their names to impressive things like Schwerdtfeger (“The one who sweeps with his sword”). A mercenary is a single minded person doing the job without any regrets, values or beliefs. They get the job done and move on. There is no loyalty beyond the contract and there are no demands beyond what was agreed on. They are independent and bring all the tools they need and are not interested in sharing. If you want to build a product to make some noise and you don’t expect it to be scalable or stay the way it is anyway then these are the people you want. Mercenaries are rockstars with their own label. Or think of Jayne Cobb in Firefly
• Sensei – are teachers, as simply as that. People who know their skills and know how to teach them to others. It ails me that in IT trainers are not paid as high as engineers. Being able to build something is one thing – being able to guide others to build the same so they don’t need you or your input in the future is a much less common skill. A good Sensei knows when to guide, when to explain, when to show and when to allow his students to fail and hurt themselves. It is strange but we learn more from making mistakes and avoiding them in the future than from doing things right. This should apply to companies, too. Lately when Google put Wave on the back burner a lot of people started writing sarcastic posts about it – just to learn after some research that there is no problem in failing when you analyse and salvage what was useful. A good Sensei is a developer with experience who knows what to keep away from his students and when to let them run free and show their skills. A good teacher makes himself not needed over time – for his students to become masters and then teachers themselves. Lead by example but leave space in your solutions for the creativity of your students and you will build working products that are ready for future improvements.
• Padawan – are young talents that show a massive proficiency in a certain subject matter (in the case of the Star Wars movies the force and being able to not scream every time some guy calls them “Annie”). They don’t need to be amazing at it but they should show adaptability, a hunger to improve and be open and ready to listen to advice – even if it seems not fascinating and shiny at that time. These are developers who want to build things – to create systems as a team and partner with people who are passionate about the other skills necessary to achieve the goal. They also should question authority and find their own way but be driven by achieving peace with their environment rather than disrupting it for the sake of disrupting it. They are developers that you can coach, mentor and form and partner with other skilled people to rely on another and share with another. They are also developers that when they get bored with what they do should get the chance to switch departments, roles and train them up to become leaders and Sensei

What do you think? Is it worth to let vanity and arrogance run our markets and frustrate people who want to learn rather than shine or should we concentrate on building an empowered work force rather than a privileged few?

Things that made me happy this morning:

• Addy Osmani’s Rocket Bar looks cool but needs a bit of tweaking to be smooth and of course event throttling for IE. The idea is cool though (not sure about the site design and the “Where Web Businesses Grow” tagline, but I guess that is why I am not a social media superninja)
• The Tahoe Tech Talk Conference web site is really cutely designed I have to say, lots of details.
• Codestyle.org is a tutorial directory that totally passed me by for some reason
• Remy Sharp shows us how to hide the iPhone URL toolbar the right way
• You can easily do gradient text in WebKit
• True colors is a pretty insane Graffiti/Stop Motion project
• Blackstar Warrior is a Blaxploitation spoof of Star Wars. The untold story of Lando. I also want to see that for Felix Leiter and James Bond. And yes, I like those Storm Troopers. More at Lando is the man.
• HTML5 reset provides a template to start an HTML5 project from – maybe I’ll bundle that into TextMate
• Google research donated some computation time and found out that you can solve any Rubik’s Cube in 20 moves or less.
• I am sure that the Kazookeylele will be the new Vuvuzela. Also check out the Kazoo Metallica cover
• GetURLInfo is a webservice to retrieve all kind of info for a certain URL. From the same guy, there is also a GetFavicon service
• Kayak has an interface showing you how far you can get with a certain amount of money
• Google’s optimisation tool Closure Compiler is now available as a web interface and REST service. Handy for build processes
• Is this the minimalistic future of computing?
• A yummy looking external hard drive with USB stick
• An insanely talented man drew sketches of his whole red eye flight experience
• 25 vintage ads that are highly inappropriate these days
• Detailed explanation as to why Chrome is fast – Dom Bindings is the word
• Paul Irish talks about 10 things he learned from the jQuery source
• Rebecca Murphey questions wether jQuery is good for building large applications

One thing Google released at the last I/O conference was hosting for custom fonts to use in web sites for browsers that support that feature. So instead of streaming the fonts from your own server you can just point to Google’s farm and be done with it.

Fonts hosted by Google

Google hosts a few fonts for you and all you need to do is embed them.

They also released a font preview tool that allows you to tailor the font you want to your needs:

Hand-written blockquotes

One of the fonts is a scribbly little handwriting font called Reenie Beanie (I’ve used it for the sticky notes in my collection of hacks). Using this font you can create for example some sweet looking blockquotes:

All you need to do is to include the font as a CSS link:

And then you style your blockquote. As the font is rather small you need to bump up its size a bit:

blockquote{
font-family: 'Reenie Beanie', sans-serif;
font-size:160%;
background:#eee;
color:#666;
margin:1em 0;
padding:.5em;
}

And this is where it gets problematic. If for any reason the font cannot be loaded or the browser doesn’t support custom fonts, the experience is less pretty:

Which is a big problem of any pure CSS solutions – you hope things work but you can’t test for it (media queries being the exception here). However, there is another way to use the Google fonts.

Test, don’t hope

Instead of using the direct CSS links you can use the JavaScript Webfont loader which creates the style links with JavaScript and gives you a handle on what was loaded and not (Bonus: the loader is on GitHub).

Instead of the CSS link simply add the following script:

The loader now adds classes to the HTML element of the document to tell you when the font is loaded and when it is available. You can load Google fonts, those hosted by TypeKit and really any other on the web. For all the fonts you specify in the loaded these classes are .wf-inactive and .wf-active respectively. You can also test for a certain font with its name and weight. So to check for Reenie Beanie, the class is .wf-reeniebeanie-n4-active when it is available.

You can use this to define the whole style as relying on the font:

.wf-reeniebeanie-n4-active blockquote{
font-family: 'Reenie Beanie', sans-serif;
font-size:160%;
background:#eee;
color:#666;
margin:1em 0;
padding:.5em;
}

Even better, the webfont loader also provides you with events to subscribe to:

WebFontConfig = {
google: {
families: [ 'Tangerine', 'Cantarell' ]
},
typekit: {
id: 'myKitId'
},
loading: function() {
// do something
},
fontloading: function(fontFamily, fontDescription) {
// do something
},
fontactive: function(fontFamily, fontDescription) {
// do something
},
fontinactive: function(fontFamily, fontDescription) {
// do something
},
active: function() {
// do something
},
inactive: function() {
// do something
}
};

You can use that to display loading messages during font retrieval and all kind of other tricks.

One of my real annoyances right now is that when you open a link from Google reader and some other systems you get the link followed by tracking data. Take for example the following tweet from Sam:

If you click the bit.ly link it expands to this abomination:

http://google-chrome-browser.com/test-your-browsers-html5-prowess-html5-test?
utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter
&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Google-Chrome-Browser+%28Google+Chrome%29&utm_content=Twitter

I’ve come across lots of delicious bookmarks that still have all that campaign monitoring stuff in them, which is annoying. To work around that I’ve just written myself a tiny GreaseMonkey script:

Install un-UTM for GreaseMonkey

If the browser now opens a link that has UTM data in it, it removes the information and reloads the page without it to make for a cleaner URL.

Here’s the source of the script for the paranoid:

var loc = window.location.toString();
if(loc.indexOf('utm_source')!==-1){
  window.location = loc.replace(/\?utm_source.*/,'');
}