So you want to create accessible online video, huh?Monday, July 21st, 2008
This is a short explanation as to what I consider a good way to make online video accessible. I’ve based it on research done to create the Easy YouTube Player. There are no code examples in this article – only links to solutions that are already in place. We will tackle the issue of a sample framework for accessible online video at Scripting Enabled
Online video is a great thing, no doubt about that. Not a day goes past where millions of people on the web spend time watching tutorials, screencasts, instructions, TV shows, movies and yes – monkeys falling out of trees – online.
The problem is that whilst video can be highly inclusive – as shown in this example of a deaf chat room – it is also alien to the technologies the web was built on.
Video is a stranger to the web (for now)
Browsers do not have any native video display yet – HTML 5 is going in that direction but it’ll take some time until all browsers in use support that. In order to play videos on web sites we need to rely on other technology embedded into web documents – so called plug-ins.
Plug-in technology came and went over the years, there was RealPlayer with its infamous “buffering” messages, Quicktime with its amazing difference in quality between Macs and lesser fortunate computers, Windows Media player with its inability to play on other platforms than Windows (until lately, that is) and a plethora of Linux geek formats – OGG, Matroska and the like – all of them free, open source, full of great ideas and lacking any significant adoption and market share.
You can use any of these to create online video and they all come with good authoring tools – most of them on the expensive side – but if you really want to make your life easier, use the plug-in that left all of the others in its wake in terms of market adoption and cross-platform portability: Flash.
Flash – aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh, saviour of the internet?
YouTube and other online video sites showed that the main trick to reach millions of users and consumers out there is to make embedding video information as easy as possible. Most of YouTube’s views and traffic comes from outside their network from embeds in blogs, news sites and other web sites. With Flash being very much on almost every computer it’d be almost criminal not to support it. Monopolies are never good, but lately Adobe has gone leaps and bounds in making Flash more available to third party developers and in terms of internal structures and APIs many another technology can take a leaf out of their book. And of course we have Silverlight to battle this monopoly in the nearer future – let’s hope Microsoft take the Flash learnings into consideration.
The Flash video format (FLV) is tailored for web use – small, streaming, allowing for captions and sound and video separation – it simply makes a lot of sense.
So we have the technology, we have a good format, what keeps us from creating inclusive video?
Failure to focus – browser and plugin and assistive technology not sitting in a tree
The problem with Flash and accessibility is not necessarily the system itself – it is the communication of browsers with plug-ins. These things being alien to the native environment of HTML, we have once again to live with vast differences in implementation across browsers. If you open the flash movies directly in the browser, this is less of an issue, the problem is embedding them into HTML documents. This is what we constantly do though to ensure that search engines can find our sites as until recently Flash content wasn’t indexed by them.
Microsoft, with Active-X as the poster child of amazing productivity and interaction between standalone apps and the web (and allowing many a virus and Trojan to run free) did actually a very good job in allowing communication of Flash, MSIE and assistive technology.
In Firefox, on the other hand, you cannot use your keyboard to tab into a Flash movie. You can set and release focus in Flash and tab around movies, but somehow it is terribly flaky and a lot is down to luck – or sticking to Internet Explorer and Windows.
The latter does not sit well with me. Firefox has amazing accessibility opportunities and all extensions I have encountered so far are free. Why should someone have to pay lots of money just to access the web when I can buy a 100 pound (or 200 US Dollar) laptop, get Linux and Firefox or Opera and go for it? Apple computers come out-of-the-box with voiceover as a screen reader, why not Windows?
Anyways, back to the focus issue. Whilst there is a good visual clue that something is focused in Flash this does not necessarily mean assistive technology will know about it. This is a problem, and a lot of people also don’t like this to happen – do you know how many times you get asked as a web developer to “remove the ugly border around links when you click them”?
Avoiding the focus issue by creating the browser-plug-in communication
Embedding Flash can be tricky, as – you might have guessed – not all browsers do it the same way. Therefore it is a good idea to use an abstraction tool like SWFObject to include your Flash. This means we are already depending on scripting to embed Flash, which has the practical upshot that we automatically know that both are available.
Solid interaction patterns
Possibly fixing the keyboard access problem
Technically you should be able to fix the tabbing-into-Flash issue by having a method in your Flash movie that focuses a certain element. Then you can create a text link that calls this method to “skip into Flash”.
Piggy-backing on the browser
When the first Flash applications came out people talked about a revolution in web-based Rich Interface Applications. Instead of having to show hard-to-style form elements and non-scalable graphics and links we had a vector-based interface at our disposal and could create any application and interface element we wanted to create. Somehow Ajax put a dent into this some years later (and it is pretty amazing how many Ajax problems can be solved when you look at solutions Flash developers found for them long ago) and one of the reasons was that the HTML interface – whilst ugly and hard to style consistently – simply works.
HTML is much more than just a visual representation. It is an interactive layer describing what certain elements are and what browsers should do with them supporting a multitude of input devices.
Furthermore the browser notifies all kind of other software when users interact with HTML elements like links and buttons. Just try to create something as seemingly easy as a scroll-bar yourself and analyze all the interactivity both in terms of content to scroll and keyboard controls to support – it is not easy.
Therefore it does make sense to use HTML elements to drive Flash players – the base user interactivity has already been created and tested for you by browser manufacturers.
What to use then? How do you write a player?
The good news is that you don’t have to write your own player, as there are several options already out there.
- If you want to use YouTube content, you can use the “YouTube player API”:http:// to control the look and feel of the player.
- If you want to host video yourself, there’s the JW media player which does not only support a lot of formats and has an API to control it, but also has support for captions and other accessibility enhancements. Jeroen will be in London for Scripting Enabled and we’ll take a closer look at what we can do together.
Even if you don’t want to use the players themselves you can in the JW case look at the source and get your inspiration from that.
- Use what works – offer a description of the movie, maybe a thumbnail and link to the movie file explaining the type and the size inside the link
- Instead of relying on the player controls to be accessible, create HTML controls that drive the player using the DOM and a player API.
- We will create proper code examples for all of this at Scripting Enabled.
I have to thank Antonia Hyde, Mike Davies, Artur Ortega, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis, Jacob Seidelin, Ian McBurnie, Steven Webster, Dirk Ginader and Jeroen Wijering for great input and their research on the matter. I’ve been asked to put this together by Kath Moonan/AbilityNet and Julie Schiller/BBC and hope this will be beneficial for all.